11/26/2012 · In 1991, plaintiff Sargon Enterprises , Inc . ( Sargon ) patented a dental implant that its president and chief executive officer, Dr. Sargon Lazarof, had developed. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved the implant, which meant it.
certainty.? ( Sargon Enterprises , Inc . v . University of Southern California (Feb. 25, 2005, B167519) [nonpub. opn.].) On remand, the case proceeded to retrial on the breach of contract claim. USC moved to exclude as speculative the proffered opinion testimony of one of Sargon ‘s experts, James Skorheim. The court presided over an eight-day, The University of Southern California ( USC ) breached its contract with Sargon Enterprises , Inc . ( Sargon ), yet convinced the trial court for the second time to exclude evidence of lost profits on the ground it was speculative. We conclude the trial court erred by excluding Sargon.
10/22/2013 · What is the likely effect of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sargon Enterprises , Inc . v . University of Southern California (“ USC ”), 55 Cal. 4th 747 (2012), on the…
What is the likely effect of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sargon Enterprises , Inc . v . University of Southern California (“ USC ”), 55 Cal. 4th 747 (2012), on the admissibility of expert testimony in California?This major decision, in which Quinn Emanuel won a 7-0 victory for USC , upheld a trial court’s exclusion of expert lost profits testimony as unduly speculative and …
Filed 2/25/05 Sargon Enterprises v . USC CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for, ( Sargon Enterprises, Inc . v . University of Southern California (Feb. 9, 2011, B202789, B205034) [nonpub. opn.], p. 38 ( Sargon II).) (c) Review in the Supreme Court After this court reversed the trial court s exclusion of lost profit damages in Sargon II, USC sought review of that decision in the Supreme Court.3 On November 26, 2012, the Supreme …
4/21/2014 · Sargon Enterprises v . U.S.C .
55 Cal.4th 747 (2012) is easily the most important expert testimony case rendered by the California Supreme Court in years. The c, INTRODUCTION . Contrary to USC ‘s spin, this case is not about Sargon Enterprises pursuing a vexatious litigation strategy on whimsical claims. It is about a jury not being allowed to even consider any of Sargon ‘s lost profits evidence or its newly discovered claims that USC tampered with patient records and accepted a virtual bribe from Sargon ‘s chief competitor while it was …
